Mahama Files Fresh Suit To Stop Akufo-Addo From Being Sworn-In As President On Jan 7 (VIDEO)

VIDEO:ahama Files Fresh Suit To Stop Akufo-Addo From Being Sworn-In As President On Jan 7

The last few hours have been filled with news of NDC’s Presidential candidate John Dramani Mahama filing a petition at the Supreme Court to challenge the result of the 2020 presidential elections. has reported extensively on the events that led Mr. Mahama to file a petition at the apex court at about 12pm on Wednesday.

Among the reliefs in his petition, the former President  is praying the court to first all, annul the 2020 presidential results and consequently order the Electoral Commission (EC)  to re-run the election as he has observed ‘mathematical and statistical’ errors in the figures the EC reported.

Second, Mr. Mahama has petitioned the court to place an order of injunction restraining NPP presidential candidate Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo, the 2nd Respondent from holding himself out as President-elect, since to him ‘the said declaration was made without regard to due process of law as required under Articles 23 and 296 (b) of the 1992 Constitution’.

The NDC leader revealed that the votes obtained by him and the 2nd Respondent were incorrect and not enough for the Chairperson of the EC, Mrs Jean Adukwei Mensa, 1st Respondent to declare the latter as winner.

He stated in his petition that, ‘The claim that percentage of votes obtained by the 2nd Respondent [Nana Akufo-Addo] was 51.595% [6,730,413] of the total valid votes that she distinctly stated to have been 13,434,574 was a manifest error, as votes cast for 2nd Respondent would amount to 50.098% and not the 51.595% erroneously declared’.


Mr. Mahama argued that the 1st Respondent in her December 9 declaration said the NDC candidate obtained 6,214,889 being 47.366% of the valid votes.

‘From the total votes cast of 13,434,574, petitioner’s percentages would reduce to 46.260% and not the 47.366% erroneously declared.


3. An order of mandatory injunction directing the 1st Respondent to proceed to conduct a second election with Petitioner and 1st Respondent as the candidates as required under Articles 63(4) and (5) of the 1992 Constitution’.


What’s your reaction to this post?


Related Posts

Next Post

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Click here
More news. Join our WhatsApp group